Black Caucus Chair Akilah Weber Pierson Applauds California Ban on Police Officers Wearing Face MasksSen. Akilah Weber Pierson (D-San Diego), chair of the California Legislative Black Caucus (CLBC) last week praised California’s new law limiting when law enforcement officers may wear face coverings, calling it a critical step toward accountability and public trust in policing. The measure, SB 627 -- also known as the No Secret Police Act -- was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom last year and took effect on Jan. 1. It restricts law enforcement officers from wearing facial coverings while performing public duties, except under limited operational circumstances. The law applies to local, state, and federal agencies operating in California and requires departments to adopt and publicly post mask-use policies by July 1, 2026. Weber Pierson, a co-author of the legislation, said the law affirms the public’s right to transparency. “The public has a right to know who is enforcing the law in our communities,” Weber Pierson posted on Facebook on Jan. 14. Framing the issue as more than administrative oversight, Weber Pierson stated that visibility and accountability are essential to community well-being. “Transparency in policing is a public health issue,” she added, noting that communities cannot heal from historical trauma when officers wield authority anonymously. Despite support from civil rights advocates, the law is facing a federal court challenge. The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking to pause its application to federal agents, arguing that the measure interferes with federal law enforcement operations, particularly immigration enforcement. Federal attorneys told the court on Jan. 14 that the law improperly regulates federal officers and exposes them to increased safety risks. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said officers are increasingly targeted through facial recognition and AI tools, claiming an “8,000% increase in threats” against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. He also cited instances of agents being tracked to their homes and harassed. During the hearing, the judge raised concerns about potential unequal treatment if exemptions apply differently to state and federal officers. A decision on the request to pause enforcement is expected soon. Supporters of SB 627 argue the law advances civil rights by ensuring officers are identifiable during public interactions, while opponents contend it endangers officer safety and undermines federal enforcement authority -- setting the stage for a legal battle with broader implications for policing and oversight in California.
Thursday, 22 Jan 2026
Thursday, 22 January 2026

Dope Dating Advice with Dr. Kerry Neal: Forgiveness and Dating

Fontana, CA — Now you’re probably wondering, “What in the world does forgiveness have to do with dating?”

Quite a lot, actually.

We like to pretend that dating exists in a sealed-off box—free from childhood wounds, parental disappointments, or unresolved relationship ghosts. But the reality? Most of us are trying to build a future with someone while carrying emotional baggage we refuse to check. And then we act surprised when turbulence comes.

Recently, I came across a post listing the four most important people you should forgive: your parents, others, yourself, and those you have wronged. At first glance, it seemed like standard self-help advice. But as I thought more about it, I realized: this is a blueprint for better dating.

Because unforgiveness—especially within our community—can secretly, steadily, and ruthlessly undermine the very connections we aim to build.

And the real surprise? Most of us aren’t even aware we’re doing it.

  1. The Parents: The First (and Most Difficult) Forgiveness

Let’s start with the big one.

Black relationship experts like Dr. Thema Bryant (current APA president, researcher, and theologian of the heart) and Dr. Nadine Burke Harris (renowned for her work on childhood trauma) consistently remind us that unhealed parental wounds shape our attachment, expectations, and ability to trust.

You can be 26 or 56—if you still haven’t forgiven your parents, you’re essentially still dating them in the room.

Not literally (thank God), but emotionally.

When you don’t forgive your mother, you may:

  • Expect emotional labor your partner can’t fulfill
  • Overcorrect by being hyper-independent
  • Interpret love as instability
  • Guard your heart like Fort Knox

When you don’t forgive your father, you may:

  • Mistrust consistency (“When will you leave?”)
  • Expect abandonment as the norm
  • Confuse chaos for chemistry
  • Assume you must earn love rather than receive it

Dr. Joy Harden Bradford, founder of Therapy for Black Girls, states clearly: unforgiven parental wounds become relationship templates.

And here’s where it ties to dating:

If you don’t forgive your parents, you may end up punishing your partner for wrongs they never committed.

You’ll misinterpret their intentions through the blurry lens of your upbringing. You’ll view their care with suspicion, see their boundaries as rejection, and interpret their love as a trick you’re determined not to fall for.

You can’t create a future when the past keeps auditioning for a part.

  1. The Self as Stealth Saboteur

This is uncomfortable but necessary.

Unforgiveness isn’t just directed outward. Many of us can forgive others long before we forgive ourselves, especially in Black communities where resilience is celebrated but self-compassion is viewed as a luxury.

We love grace—for everyone else.

But when it comes to ourselves? That’s where we get stingy.

Dr. Howard Stevenson, a prominent Black psychologist and researcher on racial identity and trauma, discusses this in his work: people who haven’t forgiven themselves often sabotage relationships because deep down, they don’t feel worthy of healthy love.

Self-unforgiveness shows up like this:

  • You overthink everything you do
  • You assume partners will eventually “see the real you” and leave
  • You apologize excessively
  • You sabotage good relationships because good feels foreign
  • You choose the wrong people because you think you deserve it

This is where the “stealth saboteur” emerges.

You think you’re protecting yourself, setting boundaries, being discerning.

But you may actually be:

  • Nitpicking
  • Withholding affection
  • Choosing emotionally unavailable partners
  • Ending things prematurely
  • Over-investing in the wrong people
  • Avoiding vulnerability in the name of “standards.”

A sneer for truth’s sake:
Some of us aren’t being “high value”—we’re just being very avoidant.

And we’re calling it protection.

But protection should not feel like punishment.

  1. Forgiving Others: The Ex-Files

Let’s discuss exes—the most debated form of forgiveness.

Black relationship therapist Dr. Shari Collins often reminds her clients that unforgiveness of past partners solidifies into suspicion. You begin dating as if everyone is your ex in disguise. When the new woman says she’s running late, you automatically think she’s your ex-girlfriend who lied and cheated. When the new man needs space to process, you immediately assume he’s your ex who ghosted.

When we don’t forgive others, we create emotional double jeopardy:

  • New partners are forced to prove they aren’t the last ones.
  • We use ‘interrogate’ instead of ‘inquire.’
  • We test instead of trust.
  • We over-protect instead of connect.

But here’s the plot twist:

Forgiveness isn’t about setting them free. It’s about freeing yourself from the rerun.

As Dr. Bryant says, “You cannot create a new story while rereading the old chapters.”

  1. Pop Culture as the Mirror

Unforgiveness is not just personal—it’s cultural.

Look at recent pop-culture dynamics.

Netflix’s Love Is Blind repeatedly shows old wounds disguised as new drama. People enter the pods thinking they’re ready for love, only to fall apart when emotional intimacy requires vulnerability their childhood never taught them to handle.

Or consider Insecure. Issa and Lawrence’s entire story focused on forgiveness—not just of each other but also of themselves. Their breakthroughs didn’t occur because they drifted apart, but because they turned inward.

And when they finally forgave themselves and each other?
They found their way back.

Unforgiveness is a relationship detour. Forgiveness is the GPS rerouting.

  1. The Ask for Forgiveness: The Courage to Be Accountable

Asking for forgiveness might be the hardest on the list.

But it’s also the key to dating success.

Relationships thrive on accountability. Black marriage researcher Dr. Shirley Hill notes in her work on relational health in Black families that the willingness to admit even small wrongs creates trust, vulnerability, and longevity.

Accountability says:

  • “My ego matters less than this connection.”
  • “I want harmony, not dominance.”
  • “I can be imperfect and still worthy of love.”

It signals emotional maturity—an underrated currency in dating.

Bringing It All Together: Forgiveness as a Dating Strategy

Forgiveness is not a soft skill—it’s a survival skill. Especially in dating.

Unforgiveness breeds suspicion.
Suspicion erodes trust. Trust depends on vulnerability.
Vulnerability requires safety.
Safety hinges on healing.
Healing starts with forgiveness.

If you’re wondering why your dating life feels stuck, repetitive, or draining, begin with this gentle but direct question:

Who haven’t you forgiven—mother, father, ex, or self—that still shapes your choices today?

Because the truth is simple:

You can’t build something new while holding onto what hurt you.
You can’t receive healthy love with hands full of bitterness.
You can’t create a future while still rehearsing the pain of the past.

Forgiveness won’t erase the wound.
But it will stop the wound from choosing your partners for you.

And that, my friends, is where real dating success begins.

The Most Read

Civil Rights Icon Rev. K.W. Tulloss to Release Born to Make a Difference on January 22, 2026

CDPH: Super Flu Cases on the Rise in California

Black Caucus Chair Akilah Weber Pierson Applauds California Ban on Police Officers Wearing Face MasksSen. Akilah Weber Pierson (D-San Diego), chair of the California Legislative Black Caucus (CLBC) last week praised California’s new law limiting when law enforcement officers may wear face coverings, calling it a critical step toward accountability and public trust in policing. The measure, SB 627 -- also known as the No Secret Police Act -- was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom last year and took effect on Jan. 1. It restricts law enforcement officers from wearing facial coverings while performing public duties, except under limited operational circumstances. The law applies to local, state, and federal agencies operating in California and requires departments to adopt and publicly post mask-use policies by July 1, 2026. Weber Pierson, a co-author of the legislation, said the law affirms the public’s right to transparency. “The public has a right to know who is enforcing the law in our communities,” Weber Pierson posted on Facebook on Jan. 14. Framing the issue as more than administrative oversight, Weber Pierson stated that visibility and accountability are essential to community well-being. “Transparency in policing is a public health issue,” she added, noting that communities cannot heal from historical trauma when officers wield authority anonymously. Despite support from civil rights advocates, the law is facing a federal court challenge. The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking to pause its application to federal agents, arguing that the measure interferes with federal law enforcement operations, particularly immigration enforcement. Federal attorneys told the court on Jan. 14 that the law improperly regulates federal officers and exposes them to increased safety risks. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said officers are increasingly targeted through facial recognition and AI tools, claiming an “8,000% increase in threats” against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. He also cited instances of agents being tracked to their homes and harassed. During the hearing, the judge raised concerns about potential unequal treatment if exemptions apply differently to state and federal officers. A decision on the request to pause enforcement is expected soon. Supporters of SB 627 argue the law advances civil rights by ensuring officers are identifiable during public interactions, while opponents contend it endangers officer safety and undermines federal enforcement authority -- setting the stage for a legal battle with broader implications for policing and oversight in California.

New Ballot Push: Initiative Would End Prop 50 Temporary Congressional Maps After 2026

Victory Community Church Invites Inland Valley Residents to Worship Service in Ontario

Exit mobile version